{"id":8155,"date":"2026-10-07T17:45:31","date_gmt":"2026-10-07T17:45:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stiri-faine.com\/?p=8155"},"modified":"2026-10-07T17:45:31","modified_gmt":"2026-10-07T17:45:31","slug":"lovitura-ilie-bolojan-pierde-disputa-cu-instanta-suprema-ccr-a-decis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stiri-faine.com\/?p=8155","title":{"rendered":"LOVITUR\u0102! Ilie Bolojan PIERDE disputa cu Instan\u021ba Suprem\u0103! CCR a decis\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a respins miercuri, 7 octombrie, ca ne\u00eentemeiat\u0103, sesizarea formulat\u0103 de premierul demis Ilie Bolojan privind un posibil conflict juridic de natur\u0103 constitu\u021bional\u0103 \u00eentre Guvern \u0219i \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u021bie \u0219i Justi\u021bie. Disputa vizeaz\u0103 alocarea fondurilor necesare pentru achitarea drepturilor salariale restante ale magistra\u021bilor, \u00een valoare de aproximativ 4,8 miliarde de lei.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u0218ase dintre cei nou\u0103 judec\u0103tori constitu\u021bionali au votat pentru respingerea cererii. Prin aceast\u0103 decizie, CCR nu a acceptat argumentele Executivului referitoare la existen\u021ba conflictului constitu\u021bional invocat de Ilie Bolojan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Separat de sesizarea adresat\u0103 Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale, procesul privind plata efectiv\u0103 a sumelor restante urma s\u0103 primeasc\u0103 o solu\u021bie din partea Instan\u021bei Supreme, dup\u0103 mai multe am\u00e2n\u0103ri.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ce a contestat Ilie Bolojan la CCR<br>Sesizarea premierului interimar a vizat demersurile \u00cenaltei Cur\u021bi prin care Guvernul \u0219i Ministerul Finan\u021belor au fost obligate s\u0103 asigure plata restan\u021belor salariale din Justi\u021bie.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ilie Bolojan a sus\u021binut c\u0103 Instan\u021ba Suprem\u0103 \u0219i-ar fi dep\u0103\u0219it atribu\u021biile constitu\u021bionale atunci c\u00e2nd a impus alocarea unor fonduri bugetare. Argumentul prezentat de acesta a fost c\u0103 stabilirea bugetului \u0219i adoptarea rectific\u0103rilor bugetare intr\u0103 \u00een competen\u021ba Executivului \u0219i a Legislativului.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen interpretarea sus\u021binut\u0103 de Guvern, obligarea autorit\u0103\u021bilor s\u0103 aloce bani pentru aceste pl\u0103\u021bi ridica o problem\u0103 privind delimitarea atribu\u021biilor institu\u021biilor. Din acest motiv, premierul a cerut Cur\u021bii Constitu\u021bionale s\u0103 analizeze dac\u0103 demersurile \u00ceCCJ au generat un conflict juridic de natur\u0103 constitu\u021bional\u0103.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Judec\u0103torii CCR au respins \u00eens\u0103 sesizarea ca ne\u00eentemeiat\u0103, cu votul a \u0219ase membri ai Cur\u021bii din totalul de nou\u0103.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cenalta Curte a cerut achitarea drepturilor salariale restante<br>\u00cen centrul disputei se afl\u0103 aproximativ 4,8 miliarde de lei reprezent\u00e2nd drepturi salariale restante ale magistra\u021bilor. Sumele provin din major\u0103ri stabilite retroactiv prin hot\u0103r\u00e2ri judec\u0103tore\u0219ti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cenalta Curte a solicitat plata acestor drepturi, iar Curtea de Apel Bucure\u0219ti admisese anterior ac\u021biunea formulat\u0103 de Instan\u021ba Suprem\u0103. Prin solu\u021bia pronun\u021bat\u0103, Guvernul \u0219i Ministerul Finan\u021belor au fost obligate s\u0103 achite restan\u021bele.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Executivul a contestat, din perspectiva atribu\u021biilor constitu\u021bionale, impunerea aloc\u0103rilor bugetare necesare. \u00ceCCJ a urm\u0103rit, \u00een schimb, ob\u021binerea fondurilor pentru plata drepturilor salariale rezultate din hot\u0103r\u00e2rile judec\u0103tore\u0219ti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Decizia CCR este favorabil\u0103 pozi\u021biei Instan\u021bei Supreme \u00een aceast\u0103 disput\u0103, \u00eentruc\u00e2t argumentul Guvernului privind existen\u021ba unui conflict constitu\u021bional nu a fost acceptat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Procesul privind plata efectiv\u0103 r\u0103m\u00e2ne distinct<br>Respingerea sesiz\u0103rii lui Ilie Bolojan prive\u0219te problema constitu\u021bional\u0103 adus\u0103 \u00een fa\u021ba CCR. Aceasta trebuie diferen\u021biat\u0103 de procesul referitor la achitarea efectiv\u0103 a drepturilor salariale restante.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u00cen paralel cu demersul constitu\u021bional, Instan\u021ba Suprem\u0103 urma s\u0103 se pronun\u021be \u00een litigiul privind plata sumelor, dup\u0103 ce decizia fusese am\u00e2nat\u0103 de mai multe ori.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Astfel, hot\u0103r\u00e2rea din 7 octombrie \u00eenl\u0103tur\u0103 argumentul invocat de premier \u00een sesizarea adresat\u0103 CCR, dar informa\u021biile prezentate nu indic\u0103 faptul c\u0103 cele aproximativ 4,8 miliarde de lei au fost deja achitate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Disputa are, a\u0219adar, dou\u0103 componente: analiza atribu\u021biilor constitu\u021bionale ale institu\u021biilor implicate \u0219i solu\u021bionarea procesului privind obliga\u021bia de plat\u0103. \u00cen prima dintre acestea, Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a decis respingerea cererii formulate de Ilie Bolojan ca ne\u00eentemeiat\u0103.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Curtea Constitu\u021bional\u0103 a respins miercuri, 7 octombrie, ca ne\u00eentemeiat\u0103, sesizarea formulat\u0103 de premierul demis Ilie Bolojan privind un posibil conflict juridic de natur\u0103 constitu\u021bional\u0103 \u00eentre Guvern \u0219i \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u021bie \u0219i Justi\u021bie. Disputa vizeaz\u0103 alocarea fondurilor necesare pentru achitarea drepturilor salariale restante ale magistra\u021bilor, \u00een valoare de aproximativ 4,8 miliarde de lei. \u0218ase dintre &#8230; <a title=\"LOVITUR\u0102! Ilie Bolojan PIERDE disputa cu Instan\u021ba Suprem\u0103! CCR a decis\u2026\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/stiri-faine.com\/?p=8155\" aria-label=\"Read more about LOVITUR\u0102! Ilie Bolojan PIERDE disputa cu Instan\u021ba Suprem\u0103! CCR a decis\u2026\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8155","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stiri-faine.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8155","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stiri-faine.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stiri-faine.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stiri-faine.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stiri-faine.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8155"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/stiri-faine.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8155\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8156,"href":"https:\/\/stiri-faine.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8155\/revisions\/8156"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stiri-faine.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8155"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stiri-faine.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8155"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stiri-faine.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8155"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}